The 15 European standards move the discussion from “recyclable material” towards sortability, compatibility with real recycling processes and evaluation of the output.
In 2026, the EN 18120 family provided the European plastic packaging industry with a common technical framework for Design for Recycling. The significance goes beyond the publication of another series of standards: the statement “this packaging is recyclable” is increasingly being replaced by a much more concrete question — can we demonstrate that the packaging can be sorted, processed and turned into usable recycled material?
A draft implementing regulation, formally notified to the WTO on 6 August 2026, would for the first time set common rules, valid across all Member States, for the moment at which recycled plastic legally ceases to be waste
- The European Commission notified the WTO, on 6 August 2026, of a draft implementing regulation on End-of-Waste (EoW) criteria for plastic waste, based on Article 6(2) of the Waste Framework Directive 2008/98/EC.
- The WTO comment deadline is 20 September 2026. The regulation is NOT adopted and NOT in force.
- The scope covers thermoplastic polymers and blends of thermoplastic polymers, "regardless of polymer type", with PE, PET, PP, PS and PVC explicitly named as examples in a recital of the draft.
- Only mechanical recycling and solvent-based recycling are covered. Pyrolysis and other chemical recycling technologies remain, for now, outside the scope.
- The draft confirms a threshold of below 1.9% foreign material, calculated on the moisture-free weight of the recycled plastic – the figure circulating in the market is correct, according to the official text.
- External verification of the quality management system every three years, by an accredited conformity assessment body or an environmental verifier, is also confirmed.
- The chapter on importers is among the strictest in the draft: if a supplier in a third country lacks a properly verified quality management system, the imported material is treated, legally, as waste, not as a product.
- Achieving End-of-Waste status does not automatically equate to eligibility for food contact; decontamination and compliance with the specific legislation on food-contact materials are additionally required.
Practical checklist for companies: what to check now, what to document and what to have ready by 2030
- PPWR readiness starts with a complete inventory of the packaging placed on the market, not with a labelling project.
- Each packaging flow needs a clearly assigned legal role — manufacturer, importer, distributor, EPR producer.
- Markets must be mapped: where the packaging is placed on the market, where EPR obligations exist and where DRS applies.
- Design, recyclability, recycled content, reuse, labelling and EPR must be assessed as separate exposures, not as one single “PPWR project”.
- Evidence and technical documentation must be linked to the correct packaging version, not collected randomly.
- Data flows to suppliers and customers must be explicitly mapped, not assumed.
- Prioritise packaging with real risk instead of treating every product code with the same intensity.
- Prepare now what is already legally clear enough; do not lock solutions based on methodologies or specifications that are still unfinished.
- 2030 is a compliance deadline, but it may require engineering, purchasing and investment decisions years earlier.
Traceability, documents, declarations and responsibilities across the supply chain
- PPWR does not create one universal “PPWR certificate” that solves compliance across the entire supply chain.
- Each operator needs different information depending on its legal role — not everyone receives the same documents.
- Supplier information feeds the manufacturer's technical documentation, but does not replace it.
- “PPWR compliant” written on a commercial offer is not, by itself, sufficient evidence.
- Importers and distributors have their own verification obligations, distinct from those of the manufacturer.
- A material or design change may require existing evidence to be reassessed.
- Confidentiality does not remove regulatory information needs, but PPWR does not automatically give the customer access to the supplier's full formulation.
- The practical rule remains: no data, no evidence; no evidence, no compliance.
Separate collection, recycling targets, DRS and what companies need to understand about packaging end-of-life
- “Recyclable by design” and “recycled at scale” are not the same thing — PPWR introduces them in separate stages.
- Collection is necessary, but it is not the same as recycling.
- DRS is a collection mechanism, not proof of recycling.
- The 90% collection target applies to specific categories of beverage packaging, not to all packaging.
- National recycling targets and packaging-level recyclability requirements are two different legal mechanisms.
- From 2030, recyclability performance grades A, B and C come into play, while from 2035 the assessment also includes actual recycling at scale.
- From 2038, the threshold becomes stricter: packaging must fall within grade A or B.
- The practical rule remains: design for the real system, not only for the laboratory.
EPR, the producer register, contributions, and what changes for companies
- Manufacturer (the technical role from PPWR 10) and producer (the extended producer responsibility role, EPR) are different PPWR roles — the same company can be both, but it can also be only one of them.
- EPR responsibility is tied to first making packaging or packaged products available on the territory of a Member State — not to who owns the brand or who physically manufactured the packaging.
- Registration is organised Member State by Member State, not through a single, already-functional EU-wide register.
- A company selling into several EU countries may need several EPR registrations or arrangements, not just one.
- A producer responsibility organisation (PRO) can carry out EPR obligations on a producer's behalf, but that does not mean the producer's responsibility disappears.
- PPWR does not create a single EU-wide packaging tax — the financial mechanism remains organised through national EPR systems.
- Better recyclability can increasingly influence EPR cost through eco-modulation — but the exact formula is not yet fixed in EU law.
- Paying EPR does not automatically mean technical PPWR compliance — these are two separate responsibility systems.
Manufacturer, converter, brand owner, importer, distributor — who must do what?
- PPWR does not automatically assign responsibility to whoever physically makes the packaging.
- Manufacturer (the PPWR conformity role) and producer (the extended producer responsibility role) are two different legal roles, tested differently.
- The manufacturer owns the final conformity conclusion under Articles 5–12 — but there is only one manufacturer for a given packaging unit.
- For sales and grouped packaging, the manufacturer is normally whoever does the final fill and places the product on the market — often the brand owner.
- For transport packaging, service packaging in its final form and primary-production packaging, the manufacturer is normally whoever physically makes the packaging, unless it carries someone else's name or trademark.
- Suppliers must provide the data needed to demonstrate compliance — but they do not draw the final conformity conclusion.
- Importers have their own verification duty; distributors carry a lighter, but real, due-care obligation.
- Standard conformity assessment is manufacturer self-assessment (Module A); there is no general requirement for third-party certification, and no official "PPWR certificate."
Labelling, symbols, consumer information and the new identification requirements - Article 12
- PPWR doesn't introduce a single labelling requirement - it's a package of at least five distinct obligations, each with its own application date.
- From 12 August 2026, only producer/importer identification and a traceability element are mandatory - not the sorting label many people think of as "the PPWR label."
- The harmonised EU pictogram-based label for material composition doesn't apply until 12 August 2028, or 24 months from the relevant implementing acts, whichever is later.
- A QR code or other digital carrier supplements the physical label - it doesn't replace it. PPWR does not require a QR code on every package.
- Reusable packaging gets its own label, on a separate timeline, from 12 February 2029.
- PPWR does not, in its own text, create a "Digital Product Passport" for packaging - this is a frequent mix-up with ESPR terminology.
- Companies should start preparing composition and traceability data now, even though the final label design isn't fixed yet.
A journey into the lesser-known history of plastics processing in Romania
When and where did plastics processing first emerge in Romania? The documents identified during our research reveal a history that reaches further back — and is considerably less linear — than we initially expected.
Reuse targets, refill and what will change for companies by 2030
● PPWR does not require all packaging to become reusable. ● Article 29 sets targeted reuse obligations for specific packaging categories. ● 2030 targets are binding; the 2040 figures are formulated as objectives operators “shall endeavour” to reach, and don’t carry the same legal force - they shouldn’t be presented as equivalent. ● A durable package isn’t enough - Article 29 relies on the existence of a system for reuse. ● Some transport flows carry a 100% requirement, but that doesn’t mean all transport packaging has to be 100% reusable. ● Pallet wrapping and straps received a specific 2026 derogation from the 100% sub-target - not a full exemption from reuse obligations. ● Reverse logistics, washing, inspection and loss rates can matter as much as the packaging itself. ● Companies should map their packaging flows now, before investing.
Restrictions on certain single-use plastic packaging formats from 2030
● The Annex V restrictions apply from 1 January 2030, not from 12 August 2026. ● PPWR does not ban single-use plastic packaging in general. Annex V contains exactly six restricted categories - full stop. ● What matters isn’t just the material, but the combination of format + application. The same PET punnet can remain perfectly legal in one use and restricted in another. ● For fresh fruit and vegetables, there’s a threshold of under 1.5 kg, but also an exemption mechanism - not an automatic ban on every package below that weight. ● In HoReCa, on-premises consumption and takeaway are not treated the same way. That difference matters enormously for what is actually restricted. ● A compostable, biodegradable or bio-based material is not automatically exempt from these restrictions. ● Companies don’t need to wait for 2030. Mapping the packaging portfolio against applications and customers can start now.
Regulation accelerates. The market is still hesitating.
- The first half of August did not bring a single clear direction for the European plastics and recycling market.
- Upstream costs came under renewed pressure, demand remained uneven, and recyclers continued to compete with attractively priced virgin material. At the same time, Europe's regulatory framework moved quickly: the PPWR became applicable, while the EU introduced new trade measures affecting the PET value chain.
Packaging minimisation, empty space, and what a company will need to be able to justify
● PPWR does not simply demand “as little packaging as possible.” It requires weight and volume to be reduced to the minimum necessary for the packaging to fulfil its functions. ● The new minimisation requirements under Article 10 apply from 1 January 2030. Until then, the current minimisation regime under Directive 94/62/EC and EN 13428:2004 continues. ● The maximum 50% empty-space cap does not apply to all packaging. It targets grouped, transport and e-commerce packaging. ● Filler materials - paper, air cushions, bubble wrap, foam or similar materials - count as empty space under the Article 24 calculation. ● Lighter packaging isn’t automatically compliant packaging. Product protection, safety, the filling process, transport, recyclability and other functions still need to be preserved. ● Companies don’t need to wait until 2030. Taking stock of packaging, measuring weight and volume, and testing reduction options can all start now.
Mandatory minimum recycled content in plastic packaging
● The mandatory minimum recycled-content percentages for plastic packaging apply, in principle, from 1 January 2030, under the timing mechanism built into PPWR and tied to the adoption of the official calculation methodology. ● There are four main plastic packaging categories, each with different targets for 2030 and 2040. ● What counts toward the mandatory percentages is recycled content recovered from post-consumer plastic waste, under the conditions set out in the Regulation. ● PIR from ordinary production-waste streams does not contribute to the mandatory minimum under Article 7. ● The exact calculation and verification methodology still has to be completed through the implementing acts provided for under PPWR. ● Companies should already be mapping their materials, suppliers and documentation - not waiting until 2029.
Design for Recycling, Recyclability and Packaging Minimisation
• The fact that packaging is considered “recyclable” today does not automatically mean that it will meet PPWR requirements in 2030. • From 2030, recyclability becomes a concrete condition for access to the EU market, based on defined criteria and performance grades. • PPWR establishes three recyclability performance grades: A – at least 95%, B – at least 80%, and C – at least 70%, calculated by weight of the packaging unit. • Below Grade C, packaging will be considered technically non-recyclable and will not be allowed on the market once the requirement applies. • From 2038, Grade C will no longer be sufficient. • Packaging minimisation is not merely a requirement for 2030. The general obligation under PPWR applies from 12 August 2026. • For certain grouped, transport and e-commerce packaging, PPWR also introduces a maximum empty-space ratio of 50%, applying according to the timetable established by the Regulation and its implementing acts. • Companies should not redesign packaging blindly. But they should start identifying potentially high-risk packaging now.
The PPWR Implementation Timeline Explained for Companies
• PPWR generally applies from 12 August 2026, but this is not the only date that matters. • Implementation is phased, with other important requirements becoming relevant in 2028, 2029 and, above all, 2030. • For many companies, 1 January 2030 is the real operational milestone: recyclability, recycled content, empty-space reduction, reuse and certain packaging restrictions converge around this period. • Some requirements still depend on delegated acts, implementing acts or standards that have yet to be finalised. • The most dangerous strategy is to wait until every legislative detail is final. • Packaging that will need to comply in 2030 is, in many cases, being designed and contracted years in advance.
How Does PPWR Connect with Other European Regulations and Who Will Be Affected?
• PPWR is not an isolated Regulation. It is part of a broader European legislative framework designed to accelerate the transition towards a circular economy. • To understand PPWR correctly, companies must also understand how it connects with other key European regulations and initiatives, including sustainable product design, digital product information, producer responsibility and sustainability reporting. • This article explains where PPWR fits within this legislative ecosystem, which companies are affected, and why understanding the broader context is essential for making informed business decisions and preparing for the changes ahead.
Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation
On 12 August 2026, the European Union's Packaging and Packaging Waste Regulation (PPWR) begins to apply across all Member States. Although many of its requirements will be introduced gradually between 2026 and 2030, companies should start preparing now. In this series, Plastinfo explains PPWR in clear, practical business language, focusing on what companies need to know and how they can prepare for the upcoming changes.
DIWASS Mandatory from 21 May, but Implementation Is in a Transition Phase
The use of the European digital system DIWASS (Digital Waste Shipment System) has become mandatory from 21 May 2026. However, European authorities introduced a transition period, until 31 December 2026, while the digital obligation for notification procedures remains in force from 21 May 2026.
Why Targeted Visibility Is More Valuable Than General Exposure
• In B2B markets, success is not determined by how many people see a message, but by who sees it. • Companies operating in the plastics and recycling industry need relevant audiences, not simply mass exposure. • Visibility among the right professionals can generate valuable contacts, opportunities and partnerships. • Specialized communication helps strengthen a company’s reputation and market position. • The Advertising & Promotion section of plastinfo.eu is designed to connect companies with a professional audience that is directly involved in the plastics and recycling sectors.